Curves and states

Date: 2015-10-07; view: 485.

In this section, we describe a way of associating states in the Hilbert space of the BCFT with the growing curves of the Loewner process. This was first understood by Bauer and Bernard [10], but we shall present the arguments slightly differently.

The boundary conditions associated with a bcc operator guarantee the existence, on the lattice, of a domain wall connecting the origin to infinity. Given a particular realisation γ, we can condition the Ising spins on its existence. We would like to be able to assume that this property continues to hold in the continuum limit: that is, we can condition the fields {ψ} on the existence of a such a curve. However, this involves conditioning on an event with probability zero: it turns out that in general the probability that, with respect to the measure in the path integral, the probability that a domain wall hits the real axis somewhere in an interval of length vanishes like ^h. In what follows we shall regard as small but fixed, and assume that the usual properties of SLE are applicable to this more general case.

Any such curve may be generated by a Loewner process: denote as before the part of the curve up to time t by γ_t. The existence of this curve depends on only the field configurations ψ in the interior of Γ, as long as γ_t lies wholly inside this region. Then we can condition the fields contributing to the path integral on the existence of γ_t, thus defining a state

(49)

The path integral (over the whole of the upper half plane, not just the interior of Γ), when conditioned on γ_t, gives a measure dμ(γ_t) on these curves. The state

|h =|ht ≡∫dμ(γt)|γt

(50)

is in fact independent of t, since it is just given by the path integral conditioned on there being a curve connecting the origin to infinity, as guaranteed by the boundary conditions. In fact we see that |h is just the state corresponding to a boundary condition changing operator at the origin.

However, dμ (γ_t) is also given by the measure on a_t in Loewner evolution, through the iterated sequence of conformal mappings satisfying dgˆ_t = 2dt/gˆ_t − da_t. This corresponds to an infinitesimal conformal mapping of the upper half plane minus K_t. As explained in the previous section, dgˆ_t corresponds to inserting (1/2πi)∫_C (2dt/z − da_t)T (z) dz. In operator language, this corresponds to acting on |γ_t with 2L₋₂dt − L₋₁da_t where L_n = (1/2πi)∫_C zⁿ⁺¹T (z) dz. Thus, for any t₁ < t

(51)

where T denotes a time-ordered exponential.

The measure on γ_t is the product of the measure of γ_t γ_t1, conditioned on γ_t1, with the unconditioned measure on γ_t1. The first is the same as the unconditioned measure on g_t1(γ_t), and the second is given by the measure on a_t^′ for t′ [0, t₁]. Thus, we can rewrite both the measure and the state in (50) as

(52)

For SLE, a_t is proportional to a Brownian process. The integration over realisations of this for t′ [0, t₁] may be performed by breaking up the time interval into small segments of size δt, expanding out the exponential to O (δt), using (B_δt)² ≈ δt, and re-exponentiating. The result is

(53)

But, as we argued earlier, |h_t is independent of t, and therefore

(54)

This means that the descendant states L₋₂|h and are linearly dependent. We say that the Virasoro representation corresponding to |h has a null state at level 2. From this follow an number of important consequences. Acting on (54) with L₁ and L₂, and using the Virasoro algebra (48) and the fact that L₁|h = L₂|h = 0 while L₀|h = h|h , leads to:

(55)

(56)

These are the fundamental relations between the parameter κ of SLE and the data of CFT. The conventional notation h_2,1 comes from the Kac formula in CFT which we do not need here. In fact this is appropriate to the case κ < 4: for κ > 4 it corresponds to h_1,2. (To further confuse the matter, some authors reverse the labels.) Note that the boundary exponent h parametrises the failure of locality in (23). From CFT we may also deduce that, with respect to the path integral measure, the probability that a curve connects small intervals of size about points r₁, r₂ on the real axis behaves like

(57)

Such a result, elementary in CFT, is difficult to obtain directly from SLE in which the curves are conditioned to begin and end at given points.

Note that the central charge c vanishes when either locality (κ = 6) or restriction (κ = 8/3) hold. These cases correspond to the continuum limit of percolation and self-avoiding walks, respectively, corresponding to formal limits Q → 1 in the Potts model and n → 0 in the O (n) model for which the unconditioned partition function is trivial.