Студопедия
rus | ua | other

Home Random lecture






References


Date: 2015-10-07; view: 361.


Note

Overall Discussion and Conclusion

A detailed reading of Johnson (2001) reveals that Clymer's original conclusions stand: the rules of phonics, at least those reviewed by Johnson, remain enormously complex. A close analysis of the actual studies reviewed by Jeynes and Littell (2000) shows that when tests of reading comprehension are considered, when real reading is considered as the core element of whole language, and when details of studies are examined closely, whole language does very well in method comparison studies. Although the authors conclude otherwise, these studies actually provide evidence for the limits of phonics instruction and the efficacy of whole language.

1. Johnson cites Becoming a Nation of Readers (Anderson, Hiebert, Scott, and Wilkinson, 1985) as holding the position that phonics can be reduced to a few simple rules that can easily be taught by the end of grade two. Not quite. Consider this excerpt: "... phonics instruction should aim to teach only the most important and regular of letter-to-sound relationships ... once the basic relationships have been taught, the best way to get children to refine and extend their knowledge of letter-sound correspondences is through repeated opportunities to read. If this position is correct, then much phonics instruction is overly subtle and probably unproductive" (Becoming a Nation of Readers, p. 38). Weaver (1994) and Goodman (1993) have pointed out that Becoming a Nation of Readers sees direct phonics instruction as playing a limited role. In fact, the position presented in the excerpt presented above is not very different from that proposed by Frank Smith (1994): A few straight-forward rules of phonics can be taught directly and can be useful in making texts more comprehensible, but most phonics is the result of reading, not the cause.

Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to Read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.

Carline, D. and Hoffman, J. (1976). Comparison of Language Experience Approach to Reading with a Conventional Reading Approach in Eight Summer Migrant Schools. ED 135557.

Clymer, T. (1963/1966). The utility of phonics generalizations in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 16/50, 252-258/182-185.

Dahl, K. and Freppon, P. (1995). A comparison of inner-city children's interpretations of reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(1), 50-74. Published also as Dahl and Freppon, 1994, ED 370 075.

Evans, M, and Carr, T. 1985. Cognitive abilities, conditions of learning, and the early development of reading skill. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (3), 327- 350.

Ewoldt, C. (1976). Miscue Analysis of the Reading of Third Grade Follow Through and Non Follow Through Children in Wichita, Kansas. ED 136 219.

Goodman, K. (1982). Language, Literacy and Learning. London: Routledge Kagan Paul.

Goodman, K. (1993). Phonics Phacts. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Publishing Company.

Goodman, K. Bird, L., and Goodman, Y. (1991). The Whole Language Catalog. Santa Rosa, CA: American School Publishers.

Harris, A. and Serwer, B. (1966a). Comparison of Reading Approaches in First-Grade Teaching with Disadvantaged Children (The Craft Project). ED 010 037

Harris, A. and Serwer, B. (1966b). The CRAFT project: instructional time in reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 27-57.

Jeynes, W. and Littell, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of whole language instruction on the literacy of low-SES students. Elementary School Journal, 101 (1), 21-33.

Johnson, F. (2001). The utility of phonics generalizations: Let's take another look at Clymer's conclusions. The Reading Teacher, 55, 132-143.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis. Beverly Hills: Laredo Publishing Company.

Krashen, S. (1999). Three Arguments Against Whole Language and Why They are Wrong. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Lamb, P. (1972). The Language Experience Approach for Teaching Beginning Reading to Culturally Disadvantaged Pupils. ED 059 858.

Manning, M., Manning, G., and Long, R. (1989). Effects of a whole language and a skills-oriented program on the literacy development of inner city primary children. ED 324642.

McCanne, R. (1966). A Study of Approaches to First-Grade English reading Instruction for Children From Spanish-Speaking Homes. ED 010 380.

Morrow, L. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(3), 250-275.

Morrow, L., O'Connor, E. and Smith, J. (1990). Effects of a story reading program on the literacy development of at-risk kindergarten children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 255-273.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Shanahan, T. (2001). Response to Elaine Garan. Language Arts, 79 (1), 70-71.

Smith, F. (1994). Understanding Reading. Fifth Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Stallings, J. (1975). Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in follow through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40, 7-8 (Serial No. 163).

Usova, C. and Usova, G. (1993). Integrating art and language arts for first grade at-risk children. Reading Improvement, 30, 117-121.

Weaver, C. (1994). Reading Process and Practice. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann Publishing Company

Wolf, F. (1986). Meta-Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

 


<== previous lecture | next lecture ==>
Method Comparisons: Conclusion | Fiat Money as a Tax Credit
lektsiopedia.org - 2013 год. | Page generation: 0.26 s.