Informational Educational Descriptive Monologue

Date: 2015-10-07; view: 594.

Any phonostylistic analysis falls into several steps. Obvious­ly the first procedure will be the description of the speech situa­tionwhich comprises the purpose, setting and participants. In reference to this text we may say that this is a descriptive narra­tive, the main purpose of the reader being just to give informa­tion, it has no secondary aim which creates a definite atmos­phere of impartiality, thus the voice timbre is distinctly resonant, the speaker sounds dispassionate and rather reserved. The presenter of the text is a student of Oxford University who has a clear advanced RP accent. The reading is directed to a group of students, Russian learners of English. The next step is to define other extralinguistic factors, the de­gree of preparednessamong them. The analyzed text may be characterized as half prepared orquazispontaneous as it was read through beforehand. Now to the characteristics on the pro­sodic level. One should undoubtedly begin with the delimita­tion.The text is split into phonopassages, then into phrases, 1 — communicative centre of a phrase. — communicative centre of a phonopassage. then into intonation groups, correspondingly, the length of paus­es is varied according to the text units. Pauses are made at syn­tactical junctures within the phrase and between them. Howev­er, potential syntagms are also quite common. The relevant length of pauses makes the reading careful and distinct so that the listeners could understand it without worrying over the meaning of a few difficult words. Among the prosodic featureswe should mention the follow­ing: Loudness is relatively stable and normal, but within a phono­passage boundaries there is a gradual decrease of it. Thus it is easy to spot the boundaries by loudness contrasts between the final and initial intonation groups of two adjacent phonopassages. The same could be said about levels and ranges: there is a distinctly marked decrease of them within the phonopassage. The rate of utterances is normal or rather slow, not noticea­bly varied. Together with the medium length of pauses the gen­eral tempo may be marked as moderate. The rhythm may be characterized as systematic, properly or­ganized, interpausal stretches have a marked tendency towards the rhythmic isochrony. One of the main style differentiating features on the prosodic level is the accentuation of the semantic centres.It is expressed commonly by terminal tones, pre-nuclear patterns, pitch range and pitch level degree of loudness on the accented syllables, and also by the contrast between the accented and non-accented segments of the utterance. In view of this particular text we may say the following. Terminal tones are commonly expressed by a low falling tone: occasionally expressive high falls are used, this usage con­veys the meaning directly; in non-final segments mid-level tones and low rising ones are quite frequent: The → most 'interesting and biˋzzare time of the year to visit ˌCambridge | is during ˎMay Week. Pre-nuclear patterns are not greatly varied, falling and level types of heads prevail. Also several falls within an intonation group are typical for the reader: The ↘ paradox is ↘ pleasantly ˋquaint | but is ↘also↘in a way ↘apt. The contrast between accented and unaccented segments of phrases is not great, which is known to be a marker of any read­ing in general; the stress is decentralized, i.e. equally distributed on accented syllables of pre-nuclear patterns. Table 3 The Invariant of Phonoatylistic Characteristics of Informational Educational Descriptive Texts Reading   Timbre impartial, dispassionate, reserved, reso­nant Delimitation phonopassages — phrases — intonational groups; pauses are mostly at syntactical junctures, normally of medium length but for the end of the passage Style-marking prosodic features     Loudness normal (piano) throughout the text, varied at the phonopassage boundaries Levels and ranges decrease of levels and ranges within the passage Rate normal (moderate) or slow, not variable Pauses mostly syntactical of normal length, occa­sional emphatic ones for the semantic ac­centuation Rhythm systematic, properly organized isochronic, decentralized accentuation Accentua­tion of semantic centres Terminal tones common use of final categoric falls; in non-final segments mid-level and low rising tones are often used Pre-nuclear patterns common use of falling and level heads or several fails within one interpausal unit Contrast between accented and unaccented segments not great 7—3483

The ↘paradox is ↘pleasantly ˋquaint, | but is ↘also ↘in a way ↘apt. || ↘May Week denotes 'not so much a particular ˋperiod of ˌtime | as the ↘general 'atmosphere of rela'xation and unˎwinding ⌇ at the → end of the year's ˎwork.

MAY WEEK IN CAMBRIDGE

(Reading)

The ^→ most 'interesting and bizˋzare time of the year to visit ˎCambridge | is during ˎMay Week. || This is ^→ neither in ˌMay |, nor it is a ˎweek. || For ^→ some ˌreason ⌇ which nobody now re>members | ˋMay Week is the 'name 'given to the ↑ first 'two 'weeks in ˎJune |, the _→ very end of the University ˋyear.

Much has been said earlier about the differences between reading and speaking. Our goal here is to demonstrate them on the prosodic level by concrete examples. Now the text "May Week in Cambridge" was reproduced spontaneously by the same speaker in the form of a monologue. He did it in a rather formal manner and directed it to the same group of students. We may specify it as a certain specialized talk intuitively associated with the task set before the speaker — to give information on customs and traditions of university life in Britain. So it is clearly restricted to a particular informational function, thus the text presented seems to be most suitable for this informational style register and we consequently have cause to refer to it.