Crossing probability

Date: 2015-10-07; view: 487.

Given a critical percolation problem inside a simply connected domain , what is the probability that a cluster connects two disjoint segments AB and CD of the boundary? This problem was conjectured to be conformally invariant and (probably) first studied numerically in [26]. A formula based on CFT as well as a certain amount of guesswork was conjectured in [1]. It was proved, for the continuum limit of site percolation on the triangular lattice, by Smirnov [7].

Within SLE, it takes a certain amount of ingenuity [5] to relate this problem to a question about a single curve. As usual, let be the upper half plane. It is always possible to make a fractional linear conformal mapping which takes AB into (−∞, x₁) and CD into (0, x₂), where x₁ < 0 and x₂ > 0. Now go back to the lattice picture and consider critical site percolation on the triangular lattice in the upper half plane, so that each site is independently coloured black or white with equal probabilities 1/2. Choose all the boundary sites on the positive real axis to be white, all those on the negative real axis to be black (see Fig. 8). There is a cluster boundary starting at the origin, which, in the continuum limit, will be described by SLE₆. Since κ > 4, it repeatedly hits the real axis, both to the L and R of the origin. Eventually every point on the real axis is swallowed. Either x₁ is swallowed before x₂, or vice versa.

(9K)

Fig. 8. Is there a crossing on the white discs from (0, x₂) to (−∞, x₁)? This happens if and only if x₁ gets swallowed by the SLE before x₂.

Note that every site on the L of the curve is black, and every site on its R is white. Suppose that x₁ is swallowed before x₂. Then, at the moment it is swallowed, there exists a continuous path on the white sites, just to the R of the curve, which connects (0, x₂) to the row just above (−∞, x₁). On the other hand, if x₂ is swallowed before x₁, there exists a continuous path on the black sites, just to the L of the curve, connecting 0− to a point on the real axis to the R of x₂. This path forms a barrier (as in the game of Hex) to the possibility of a white crossing from (0, x₂) to (−∞, x₁). Hence there is such a crossing if and only if x₁ is swallowed before x₂ by the SLE curve.

Recall that in Section 3.4.1 we related the swallowing of a point x₀ on the real axis to the vanishing of x_t = g_t (x_t) − a_t, which undergoes a Bessel process on the real line. Therefore

(31)

Denote this by P (x₁, x₂). By generalising the SLE to start at a₀ rather than 0, we can write a differential equation for this in similar manner to (29)

(32)

Translational invariance implies that we can replace ∂_a0 by -(∂_x1+∂_x2). Finally, P can in fact depend only on the ratio η = (x₂ − a₀)/(a₀ − x₁), which again reduces the equation to hypergeometric form. The solution is (specialising to κ = 6 for percolation)

(33)

It should be mentioned that this is but one of a number of percolation crossing formulae. Another, conjectured by Watts [27], for the probability that there is cluster which simultaneously connects AB to CD and BC to DA, has since been proved by Dubédat [28]. However, other formulae, for example for the mean number of distinct clusters connecting AB and CD [29], and for the probability that exactly N distinct clusters cross an annulus [30], are as yet unproven using SLE methods.