|
Do the morphemic analysis of the words on the lines of the traditional and distributional classifications.Date: 2015-10-07; view: 2585. Think of the grounds for the following phenomena to be grouped. Give paradigms of: to bring, to lie, long, speaker. a) trousers, pencils, linguistics, airs, Praguians; b) spoke, wanted, was, cut, built; c) introduce, introduced, is introducing, will introduce, has introduced; d) will come, was written, has done, is playing, is being asked, should have been done; e) their, the students', notebooks of the students; f) majority, windows, many a deer, polysemantic, cattle. Example: Do the morphemic analysis of the word “inseparable”.
a) unmistakably, children's (books), disfigured, surroundings, presume, kingdom, brotherhood, plentiful, imperishable, unprecedented, oxen; b) hammer, students' (papers), sing - sang - singing - singer, really, proficient - deficient - efficient, gooseberry, incomparable; c) quiet, perceptions, bell, unbelievably, glassy, uncommunicative, inexplicable, infamy, strenuousness; d) inconceivable, adventuresses, susceptibility, ineptitude, unfathomable, insufficiency, to prejudge, cranberry. 10. Define the type of the morphemic distribution according to which the given words are grouped. Example: insensible – incapable. The morphs “-ible” and “-able” are in complementary distribution, as they have the same meaning but are different in their form which is explained by their different environments. a) impeccable, indelicate, illiterate, irrelevant; b) undisputable, indisputable; c) published, rimmed; d) seams, seamless, seamy.
|