rus | ua | other
Home
Random lecture
|
Economic growth
Date: 2015-10-07; view: 516.

Population and GDP per capita of EU member states and some candidates.

GDP per capita in 2008 2009
>30,000 ?
>25,000 ?
>20,000 ?
>15,000 ?
>10,000 ?
The EU's share of Gross world product (GWP) is stable at around one fifth.
The twelve new member states of the European Union have enjoyed a higher average percentage growth rate than their elder members of the EU. Slovakia has the highest GDP growth in the period 2005–2011 among all countries of the European Union. Notably the Baltic states have achieved massive GDP growth, with Latvia topping 11%, close to China, the world leader at 9% on average for the past 25 years (though these gains have been in great part cancelled by the late-2000's recession).
Reasons for this massive growth include government commitments to stable monetary policy, export-oriented trade policies, lowflat-tax rates and the utilisation of relatively cheap labour. For the last year (2011), Estonia had the highest GDP growth from all the states in EU (7,6%). The current map of EU growth is one of huge regional variation, with the larger economies suffering from stagnant growth and the new nations enjoying sustained, robust economic growth.
Although EU27 GDP is on the increase, the percentage of Gross world product is decreasing due to the emergence of economic powers such as China, India and Brazil. In the medium to long term, the EU will be looking forward to increase GDP growth in Italy and the UK to stabilise growth in European Union states. This is to ensure sustained economic prosperity.
EU Member States GDP growth rates
| Member State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2005 – 2012
| Austria
| 2.4
| 3.7
| 3.7
| 1.4
| −3.8
| 2.1
| 2.7
| 0.8
| 9,5
| Belgium
| 1.7
| 2.7
| 2.9
| 1.0
| −2.8
| 2.4
| 1.8
| −0.2
| 9,8
| Bulgaria
| 6.4
| 6.5
| 6.4
| 6.2
| −5.5
| 0.4
| 1.8
| 0.8
| 24,5
| Cyprus
| 3.9
| 4.1
| 5.1
| 3.6
| −1.9
| 1.3
| 0.5
| −2.4
| 14,7
| Czech Republic
| 6.8
| 7.0
| 5.7
| 3.1
| −4.5
| 2.5
| 1.9
| −1.3
| 22,6
| Denmark
| 2.4
| 3.4
| 1.6
| −0.8
| −5.7
| 1.6
| 1.1
| −0.6
| 3,0
| Estonia
| 8.9
| 10.1
| 7.5
| -4.2
| −14.1
| 3.3
| 8.3
| 3.2
| 22,5
| Finland
| 2.9
| 4.4
| 5.3
| 0.3
| −8.5
| 3.3
| 2.8
| −0.2
| 10,0
| France
| 1.9
| 2.7
| 2.3
| −0.1
| −3.1
| 1.7
| 1.7
| 0.0
| 7,2
| Germany
| 0.7
| 3.7
| 3.3
| 1.1
| −5.1
| 4.2
| 3.0
| 0.7
| 11,9
| Greece
| 2.3
| 5.5
| 3.5
| −0.2
| −3.1
| -4.9
| -7.1
| -6.4
| -10,6
| Hungary
| 4.0
| 3.9
| 0.1
| 0.9
| −6.8
| 1.3
| 1.6
| −1.7
| 2,9
| Ireland
| 5.9
| 5.4
| 5.4
| −2.1
| −5.5
| −0.8
| 1.4
| 0.7
| 10,2
| Italy
| 0.9
| 2.2
| 1.7
| −1.2
| −5.5
| 1.8
| 0.4
| −2.4
| -1,3
| Latvia
| 10.1
| 11.2
| 9.6
| −3.3
| -17.7
| −0.9
| 5.5
| 5.6
| 17,9
| Lithuania
| 7.8
| 7.8
| 9.8
| 2.9
| −14.8
| 1.5
| 5.9
| 3.6
| 24,6
| Luxembourg
| 5.3
| 4.9
| 6.6
| −0.7
| −4.1
| 2.9
| 1.7
| 0.2
| 17,6
| Malta
| 3.6
| 2.6
| 4.1
| 3.9
| −2.6
| 2.9
| 1.7
| 0.8
| 17,8
| Netherlands
| 2.0
| 3.4
| 3.9
| 1.8
| −3.7
| 1.6
| 1.0
| −0.9
| 9,2
| Poland
| 3.6
| 6.2
| 6.8
| 5.1
| 1.6
| 3.9
| 4.3
| 2.0
| 38,7
| Portugal
| 0.8
| 1.4
| 2.4
| 0.0
| −2.9
| 1.9
| −1.6
| −3.2
| -1,4
| Romania
| 4.2
| 7.9
| 6.3
| 7.3
| −6.6
| −1.1
| 2.2
| 0.3
| 21,4
| Spain
| 3.6
| 4.1
| 3.5
| 0.9
| −3.7
| −0.3
| 0.4
| −1.4
| 7,0
| Slovakia
| 6.7
| 8.3
| 10.5
| 5.8
| −4.9
| 4.4
| 3.2
| 2.0
| 41,2
| Slovenia
| 4.0
| 5.8
| 7.0
| 3.4
| −7.8
| 1.2
| 0.6
| −2.3
| 20,1
| Sweden
| 3.2
| 4.3
| 3.3
| −0.6
| −5.0
| 6.6
| 3.7
| 0.8
| 17,0
| United Kingdom
| 2.8
| 2.6
| 3.6
| −1.0
| −4.0
| 1.8
| 0.9
| 0.2
| 6,9
| European Union
| 2.1
| 3.3
| 3.2
| 0.3
| −4.3
| 2.1
| 1.5
| −0.3
| 8,0
| Eurozone
| 1.7
| 3.2
| 3.0
| 0.4
| −4.4
| 2.0
| 1.4
| −0.6
| 6,7
| |
European Union is the largest exporter in the world and as of 2008 the largest importer of goods and services. Internal trade between the member states is aided by the removal of barriers to trade such as tariffs andborder controls. In the eurozone, trade is helped by not having any currency differences to deal with amongst most members.
The European Union Association Agreement does something similar for a much larger range of countries, partly as a so-called soft approach ('a carrot instead of a stick') to influence the politics in those countries. The European Union represents all its members at the World Trade Organization (WTO), and acts on behalf of member states in any disputes. When the EU negotiates trade related agreement outside the WTO framework, the subsequent agreement must be approved by each individual EU member.
Main trading partners(2011)
| Rank
| Partners
| Imports (million euro)
| % (of total)
| Exports (million euro)
| % (of total)
| Total trade (million euro)
| % (of total)
| -
| Total EU
| 1.685.398
| 100%
| 1.531.358
| 100%
| 3.216.756
| 100%
|
| United States
| 184,245.6
| 10,9%
| 260,553.4
| 17.0%
| 444,799.0
| 13,8%
|
| China
| 292,129.6
| 17,3%
| 136,222.3
| 8,9%
| 428,351.9
| 13,3%
|
| Russia
| 198,342.6
| 11,8%
| 108,434.0
| 7,1%
| 306,776.6
| 9,5%
|
| Switzerland
| 91,205.4
| 5.4%
| 121,671.5
| 7.9%
| 212,876.9
| 6.6%
|
| Norway
| 93,449.8
| 5.5%
| 46,529.0
| 3.0%
| 139,978.8
| 4.4%
|
| Turkey
| 47,592.7
| 2,8%
| 72,670.9
| 4.7%
| 120,263.6
| 3.7%
|
| Japan
| 67,451.7
| 4.0%
| 48,967.5
| 3,2%
| 116,419.2
| 3.6%
|
| India
| 39,314.7
| 2.3%
| 40,425.1
| 2,6%
| 79,739.8
| 2.5%
|
| Brazil
| 37,776.0
| 2,2%
| 35,728.6
| 2,3%
| 73,504.6
| 2,3%
|
| South Korea
| 36,100.7
| 2,1%
| 32,417.2
| 2,1%
| 68,517.8
| 2,1%
|
| Saudi Arabia
| 28,122.6
| 1.7%
| 26,395.1
| 1,7%
| 54,517.7
| 1,7%
|
| Canada
| 22,862.3
| 1,4%
| 29,609.1
| 1,9%
| 52,471.4
| 1,6%
|
| Singapore
| 18,941.5
| 1,1%
| 27,131.3
| 1,8%
| 46,072.8
| 1,4%
|
| Algeria
| 27,678.4
| 1,6%
| 17,205.4
| 1,1%
| 44,883.8
| 1,4%
|
| South Africa
| 17,785.0
| 1,1%
| 25,634.2
| 1,7%
| 43,419.1
| 1,3%
|
| Australia
| 11,761.9
| 0,7%
| 30,805.7
| 2,0%
| 42,567.6
| 1,3%
|
| United Arab Emirates
| 8,775.7
| 0,5%
| 32,614.8
| 2,1%
| 41,390.5
| 1,3%
|
| Hong Kong
| 10,133.5
| 0,6%
| 30,188.0
| 2,0%
| 40,321.5
| 1,3%
|
| Taiwan
| 23,946.8
| 1,4%
| 16,213.4
| 1,1%
| 40,160.3
| 1,2%
|
| Mexico
| 16,270.4
| 1,0%
| 23,802.4
| 1,6%
| 40,072.8
| 1,2%
|
| Nigeria
| 24,147.4
| 1,4%
| 12,471.9
| 0,8%
| 36,619.3
| 1,1%
|
| Ukraine
| 14,987.5
| 0,9%
| 21,196.4
| 1,4%
| 36,183.9
| 1,1%
|
| Malaysia
| 21,004.0
| 1,2%
| 11,914.9
| 0,8%
| 32,918.9
| 1,0%
|
| Israel
| 12,645.0
| 0,8%
| 16,835.6
| 1,1%
| 29,480.7
| 0,9%
|
| Thailand
| 17,534.6
| 1,0%
| 11,858.4
| 0,8%
| 29,393.0
| 0,9%
|
| Kazakhstan
| 22,725.2
| 1,3%
| 5,999.5
| 0,4%
| 28,724.7
| 0,9%
|
| Iran
| 16,340.8
| 1,0%
| 10,488.4
| 0,7%
| 26,829.3
| 0,8%
|
| Morocco
| 8,688.8
| 0,5%
| 15,167.7
| 1,0%
| 23,856.4
| 0,7%
|
| Indonesia
| 16,149.5
| 1,0%
| 7,349.8
| 0,5%
| 23,499.4
| 0,7%
|
| Egypt
| 9,510.7
| 0,6%
| 13,943.7
| 0,9%
| 23,454.4
| 0,7%
|
| Tunisia
| 9,874.1
| 0,6%
| 10,930.9
| 0,7%
| 20,804.9
| 0,6%
|
| Argentina
| 10,656.7
| 0,6%
| 8,320.0
| 0,5%
| 18,976.8
| 0,6%
|
| Chile
| 10,869.7
| 0,6%
| 7,651.3
| 0,5%
| 18,521.0
| 0,6%
|
| Qatar
| 13,321.4
| 0,8%
| 4,885.4
| 0,3%
| 18,206.8
| 0,6%
|
| Vietnam
| 12,801.4
| 0,8%
| 5,209.3
| 0,3%
| 18,010.7
| 0,6%
|
| Azerbaijan
| 14,841.9
| 0,9%
| 2,862.4
| 0,2%
| 17,704.3
| 0,6%
|
| Croatia
| 5,604.2
| 0,3%
| 11,300.7
| 0,7%
| 16,904.9
| 0,5%
|
| Iraq
| 9,469.6
| 0,6%
| 3,883.5
| 0,3%
| 13,353.1
| 0,4%
|
| Serbia
| 4,716.0
| 0,3%
| 8,486.1
| 0,6%
| 13,202.1
| 0,4%
|
| Libya
| 10,437.1
| 0,6%
| 2,066.1
| 0,1%
| 12,503.2
| 0,4%
|
| Colombia
| 6,897.8
| 0,4%
| 4,986.1
| 0,3%
| 11,883.9
| 0,4%
|
| Angola
| 6,651.3
| 0,4%
| 4,853.4
| 0,3%
| 11,504.7
| 0,4%
|
| Belarus
| 4,220.2
| 0,3%
| 7,218.3
| 0,5%
| 11,438.5
| 0,4%
|
| Bangladesh
| 8,585.4
| 0,5%
| 1,701.7
| 0,1%
| 10,287.1
| 0,3%
|
| Peru
| 6,342.2
| 0,4%
| 2,808.6
| 0,2%
| 9,150.7
| 0,3%
|
| Philippines
| 5,111.4
| 0,3%
| 3,978.8
| 0,3%
| 9,090.2
| 0,3%
|
| Venezuela
| 4,086.4
| 0,2%
| 4,886.1
| 0,3%
| 8,972.5
| 0,3%
|
| Kuwait
| 4,797.2
| 0,3%
| 3,706.7
| 0,2%
| 8,503.9
| 0,3%
|
| Pakistan
| 4,569.3
| 0,3%
| 3,740.6
| 0,2%
| 8,310.0
| 0,3%
|
| Gibraltar
| 217.5
| 0,0%
| 7,889.9
| 0,5%
| 8,107.4
| 0,3%
| |



References:
1. Oatley T. International Political Economy / Thomas Oatley. – fifth edition- Boston: Longman, 2012- 416 p.
2. Pugel T.A. International Economics: / Thomas A. Pugel – fifteenth edition – New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012 – 770 p.
3. King P. International Economics, Globalization and Policy: a reader / Philip King, Sharmila King - fifth edition - New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009 – 376 p.
4. Feenstra R.C. (2004), Advanced International Trade. Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press.
5. James Rauch (2008). "growth and international trade," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
6. M. June Flanders (2008). "international economics, history of," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
7. Reuven Glick (2008). "macroeconomic effects of international trade" The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
8. Smith, Charles (2007). International Trade and Globalisation, 3rd edition. Stocksfield: Anforme. ISBN 1-905504-10-1.
9. Stanley W. Black (2008). "international monetary institutions," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
10. Paul R. Krugman International Economics: theory and policy: / Paul R. Krugman – seventh edition- Boston: 2006
11. Cr. W. Kegley American Foreign Policy: pattern and process / Cr. W. Kegley – 2009
12. Caves R.E. World Trade and Payments: an introduction / Caves R.E. – Boston, 2007
|